X-ray vs. MRI / Courtesy of Dr. James Wittig

They are rare, but deadly. Bone and soft tissue sarcomas donโ€™t appear in your average orthopedistโ€™s office every day. And yet, if misdiagnosedโ€”unlike most orthopedic conditionsโ€”they can result in death.

Dr. James Wittig, Chief of Orthopedic Oncology and Associate Professor of Orthopedic Surgery at Mount Sinai Medical Center in New York City, does see these virulent conditions every day. And he wants his non-orthopedic oncology colleagues to know more. โ€œI would like for the general index of suspicion to be higher for bone and soft tissue sarcomas. Why? Because I have many patients appear in my office who have not had a diagnosis made for months.โ€

Many of these patients have been told that they have a hematoma, a pulled muscle, or some type of sports injury. These cancers are nuanced and can definitely present as something similar to an injury.

A young athlete shows up at an orthopedistโ€™s office complaining of thigh pain. Her physician examines her and says, โ€˜You just played a tough game. Ice it down, rest up, and you should be fine.โ€™ โ€œMaybeโ€, says Dr. Wittig. โ€œActually, patients with bone sarcoma usually complain of a mild ache in the area of the tumor that is often worse at night. And yes, many of these patients are between the ages of 10 and 20 and are involved in sports. Given this profile, an orthopedist may not order an X-ray because he thinks itโ€™s a strained muscle or ligament. What complicates the decision making further is that even if an X-ray is ordered, it may still be negative since tumors grow so rapidly that they donโ€™t cause visible (on an X-ray) destruction of the bone. The tumor is then ultimately identified by the physician on an MRIโ€”maybe six months later. It is important for physicians to see their patients back in the office six weeks after they sustain an injury or complain of an area of pain. If the pain persists then an X-ray and MRI are indicated.โ€

This is a patient who gave a history of 6 months of pain in her knee. She had seen multiple doctors who examined her and obtained X-rays. X-rays were negative and she was diagnosed with a strain. Finally the pain persisted and she began to develop swelling. An MRI was ordered that demonstrated a malignant tumor arising from the proximal tibia.

The x-ray is virtually normal. The lesion is extremely permeative resulting in only very subtle changes on the Xrays that were retrospectively identified after reviewing the MRI. The MRI clearly demonstrates the tumor.


Teasing out a bone sarcoma from a soft tissue sarcoma can usually be done by evaluating the patientโ€™s pain level, says Dr. Wittig. โ€œPatients in the early stages of bone sarcoma usually present with a dull aching pain that is persistent and may worsen with activities (causing some doctors to think it is a mechanical problem). This is because the tumor is growing and causing swelling around the bone. This is in contrast to soft tissue sarcomas where the tumor is growing from a muscle or in the soft tissue between the muscles; it may be malignant, but it is painless. Because it is painless the physician misses it, it grows significantly and is ultimately diagnosed using an MRI. Some of these masses may be soft and subcutaneous and may even palpate similar to a lipoma, a common benign fatty tumor, and be missed by the orthopedist.โ€

โ€œFlu like symptomsโ€ are one thing you wonโ€™t hear from a sarcoma patient, says Dr. Wittig. โ€œA lot of doctors think that these patients might have fever, weight loss, or night sweats, but that is not so. We must look elsewhere for clues. Unfortunately, even an X-ray might not give us information as a patient can have a tumor develop in the bone that doesnโ€™t show up on an image. With bone sarcoma the pain may or may not be relieved by medication, and may involve night pain, an ominous sign that physicians want to look out for. I generally tell my patients that if the pain or swelling doesnโ€™t disappear in six weeks to come back and see me and get an MRI.โ€

As so often happens in medicine, you look in one direction and find something pointing in another. Dr. Wittig: โ€œSometimes patients have radiological studies for other problems like a rotator cuff issue and a mass is incidentally identified on the radiological. We biopsy it and it turns out to be sarcoma.โ€

โ€œOn other occasions, โ€ says Dr. Wittig, โ€œpatients present with a mass in the thigh or leg, it is diagnosed as a blood clot, and they are sent for Doppler imaging. If there is significant hemorrhaging in the tumor patients can be diagnosed as having a hematoma. While certain tumors resemble a hematoma on an ultrasound or MRI, a hematoma will usually improve within six weeks.โ€

While your average radiologist may be very skilled, he or she doesnโ€™t likely see many sarcomas crop up on imaging. โ€œIn the case of bone sarcoma, some patients in the early stages present with the appearance of a benign tumor, something more likely to be misread by a radiologist not experienced with tumor studies. For example, I had a patient who was playing soccer and tore her ACL. She also had a small lesion in the femur that was read as benign on an MRI. After being followed for several months, the lesion grew and was finally determined to be malignant. The child ultimately underwent an amputation. The key is to always question yourself and to have a high index of suspicion. Small lesions in bone may appear benign and require close monitoring by an orthopedic oncologist.โ€

Then there are patients who are fortunate enough to see someone who has heard Dr. Wittigโ€™s message. โ€œI recently had a young patient who was in a car accident and had a pelvic injury to her left side. The treating orthopedist fixed her pelvis, but in the process of reviewing the X-rays noticed a lesion on the opposite side of her pelvis. While it appeared benign, the orthopedistโ€”who had trained with meโ€”went the extra step and ordered a CT scan and a bone scan. He then sent the patient to me for a biopsy and it turned out to be the smallest Ewingโ€™s sarcoma I had ever seen in bone.โ€

In the cacophonous, high tech world of medicine, it pays to be a little old fashioned. โ€œListen to your gut. If things donโ€™t add up, you may be looking at a tumor. If the person has injuries or fractures to the bone you should think about the mechanism of injury. I recently had a kid who was fine during his baseball game then fractured his femur while walking off the field. The X-rays didnโ€™t reveal a tumor and the fracture hematoma made it difficult to interpret the MRI but we did a biopsy and found a sarcoma growing in the bone. Extreme care is required when going after these tumors, as you can sometimes go in and disrupt the sarcoma. If you open up the fracture site where the tumor is growing and you put a metal rod through the area, then that will cause the tumor to spread and the patient will most likely require an amputation. Again, be suspicious that what you are looking at is actually what you think it is.โ€

Dr. Martin Malawer, Professor of Orthopedics at Georgetown University School of Medicine, completely agrees. โ€œBe wary if a young or middle aged adult shows up in your office with a painless massโ€”that could very well be a soft tissue sarcoma. The tendency is to think that if the person is young then they have been involved in a trauma, with around 40% of patients saying that they fell, bumped their shoulder, etc. An old time cancer surgeon would call that โ€˜traumatic determinism, โ€™ i.e., the act of falling or bumping into something brings attention to the mass. Anything larger than a few centimeters should immediately be considered malignant.โ€

A big purple bruise naturally draws attention. But, says Dr. Malawer, dig deeper. โ€œIf someone has fallen or bumped themselves, doctors will say, โ€˜Itโ€™s likely a hematoma.โ€™ The problem with this is that a hematoma rarely occurs after trauma to the muscle. The best course of action is to get an MRI, because the signal sequences can tell you if itโ€™s fat or not and if itโ€™s solid, homogeneous, or heterogeneous. An MRI will also let you know if it is necrotic or blood filled, the latter being a sign of a high grade malignancy.โ€

Then there is the issue of how to retrieve the cells for examination. โ€œIn the past surgeons would remove part of the tumor and figure out what it is afterwards. Now the standard of care is to do a core biopsy, going to the core of the tumor. What should not be done is a fine needle aspiration because they are hard to work with and most pathologists donโ€™t have lot of experience with them. You also want to avoid an incisional biopsy whenever possible because cutting into the tumor will make it bleed and cause the wider area to be contaminated with tumor cells.โ€

Then, Dr. Malawar notes, there are risks associated with relying on a non-specialist to handle such oncological issues.

For example, there are even 135 tumors of the foot and ankle. This is certainly not an area where you should do an incision and take something out if youโ€™re not sure because itโ€™s not an area where there is room for error.

Homing in on bone sarcoma, Dr. Malawer notes, โ€œThere are two groups of these cancers, one of which occurs in peds and adolescents. These cases are best treated in specialty centers with a multidisciplinary team that knows how to approach the biopsy. As Dr. Wittig mentioned, 20 years ago we would make a hole, clean out the area to get a look, and then figure out what it is we were dealing with. This was when the only treatment was amputation; today 95% of cases of bone sarcoma in kids result in limb sparing surgery. One of the major reasons weโ€™ve changed our approach is to avoid massive contamination from an inappropriate biopsy. In our practice the radiologist always asks me where exactly to do the biopsyโ€ฆin fact, he wants me to put an X on the spot.โ€

These toxic sarcomas also strike individuals in another category, says Dr. Malawerโ€ฆthose over 45 years of age. โ€œThese are chondrosarcomas and tend to occur around the pelvis or shoulder girdle. They are complex because they can mimic almost anything and can involve buttocks pain, sciatica, pelvic pain, etc. Patients might waste valuable time going, for example, to the OB/GYN before finally ending up with an orthopedic oncologist.โ€

Soft tissue sarcomas are serious for people in any group, โ€ states Dr. Malawer, โ€œbut they are one of the more common causes of death in young people. Whatever you do, donโ€™t let your guard down if someone shows up in your office with any of the aforementioned symptoms.

Join the Conversation

4 Comments

  1. A few years ago I started to have occasional shin pain at night. The pain starting to occur more often at night and I noticed a small lump on shin. A year ago I had an x-ray but nothing showed up. Now the pain wakes me up almost every night and when at rest. Sometimes while walking but mostly at rest. The muscle of that lower leg has gotten much smaller compared to my other leg. Should I be concerned?

  2. Hi Mary
    Please please get your leg checked out by someone who is familiar with sarcomas – I hope it is not one but it is important to check it out – do not ignore it – it won’t get better without help. I wish you all the best – please act on it now. Pain worse at night is unpleasant and a symptom of Ewings – I certainly do not wish to cause alarm. Best wishes [mother of 22yo with Ewings]

  3. My daughter is 16 years old. We noticed a growth along her rib above her left breast. The techs, radiologists, and doctor do not believe the lump is in the breast tissue. We have had it examined with an x-ray (1x) and ultrasound (3x). The growth has grown some in the last six months but since they don’t see anything on the scans we have been told to wait and watch for growth. We have been told since nothing is showing up the growth is likely nothing. The doctor said we could do an MRI but I wasn’t sure that was necessary…it seemed they were fairly confident it isn’t anything. After reading this article I think I will ask for a referral to an orthopedic oncologist. Thank you for this article!

  4. Iโ€™ve had a bony lump on the top of my fibula slowing growing for about 2 years now. Itโ€™s very palpable and becomes painful, especially with stretching and keeping the knee bent. Then it eases off for a while, but always comes back. Itโ€™s like a dull ache. I got an X-ray when I first noticed it, nothing showed up.

    A year ago I noticed it was getting larger faster and hurting more consistently. I got an MRI and it wasnโ€™t even addressed. They mentioned an unrelated small Bakers cyst but nothing more. So for all intensive purposes, a current MRI and a 2 year old X-ray are presumably clean.

    Today I saw a sarcoma specialist. He told me that my bones were a little uneven and Iโ€™ve had this problem all my life (I havenโ€™t). He said it wasnโ€™t getting larger, because the fibula canโ€™t enlarge (I thought thatโ€™s what sarcoma is??). He didnโ€™t believe me that it had changed in the past year. He sent me on my way. My regular orthopedist acknowledged that the lump is there, but didnโ€™t have any answers except that itโ€™s not cancer.

    Does any of this make any sense??? Has anyone out there heard of anything like this? Iโ€™m starting to think Iโ€™m hallucinating.

    PS- Iโ€™ve also had unexplained drenching night sweats for about about 2 years as well

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.