Long-leg radiographs showing alignment after total knee arthroplasty: AP view with hip–knee–ankle (HKA) angle, coronal femoral (FFC) and tibial (FTC) component angles, and lateral femoral (LFC) and tibial (LTC) component alignment / Source: Wikimedia Commons

It’s the knee alignment debate that just won’t quit. On one side, the mechanical alignment (MA) traditionalists, armed with decades of data and the comfort of neutral axes. On the other, the kinematic alignment (KA) enthusiasts, promising more “natural” knees and fewer soft-tissue releases. If this were a heavyweight fight, you’d expect fireworks.

Instead, the latest round — a Level-I RCT published August 19, 2025, in Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy — ended in what can only be called an orthopedic draw. Here’s the study: “No differences in functional and clinical outcomes after rehabilitation between modified kinematic and mechanical alignment in total knee arthroplasty: A randomized controlled trial.”


Subscribe to continue reading

  • Unlimited access to our content and archive
  • Exclusive access to our newsletter
  • Join the Conversation! Exclusive access to article comments.