Mayo Clinic researchers have extended their previous work on patellar tendon disruptions reconstructed with a step-wise surgical technique using Marlex mesh on an even larger series of cases.
Their work, “Extensor Mechanism Reconstruction with Use of Marlex Mesh: A Series Study of 77 Total Knee Arthroplasties,” appears in the August 1, 2018 edition of The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery.
Matthew P. Abdel, M.D., associate professor of Orthopedic Surgery at Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and co-author on the study told OTW, “Extensor mechanism disruptions after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are a dramatic and concerning problem for patients and surgeons alike. Multiple reconstructive techniques have been described with limited long-term success. We previously reported on a small series of patellar tendon disruptions reconstructed with our step-wise surgical technique and the use of Marlex mesh.”
“The goal of this paper was to report our substantially larger series (77 cases) including not only patellar tendon disruptions, but also quadriceps tendon disruptions and catastrophic patellar fractures with disrupted extensor mechanisms.”
The authors wrote, “During the period of 2000 to 2015 at a single tertiary care academic institution, 77 patients (77 TKAs) underwent reconstruction with use of Marlex mesh for an extensor mechanism disruption (27 quadriceps tendon disruptions, 40 patellar tendon disruptions, and 10 patellar fractures)…Eighteen (23%) of the patients underwent mesh reconstruction with the primary TKA in place, and 59 (77%) had mesh reconstruction at the time of revision TKA.”
Dr. Abdel told OTW, “Of interesting note, 76% of patients had a revision TKA at time of extensor mechanism reconstruction with Marlex mesh, and 26% of patients had a previous non-Marlex mesh attempt at an extensor mechanism reconstruction at an outside hospital. For a difficult cohort of patients, we were impressed with our results, including the following facts: 65 of the 77 mesh reconstructions were in place at the time of the latest follow-up; the Knee Society Score (KSS) significantly improved following the reconstruction (p < 0.001); Extensor lag improved by a mean of 26°, with mean postoperative extensor lag measuring 9° (p < 0.001)
“It is important that surgeons should know these three things: the stepwise surgical approach described in this paper is essential; not varying the mesh utilized in this paper is essential; three months of cast immobilization is essential.”
as a physiomesh hernia patient from 2010, that mesh didn’t last 2 weeks, and after losing my abdominal muscles, nerves, bellybutton, and skin, 5 months after FDA gave it a 510k, I don’t think this is a good idea…… did you not watch a scientist on 60Minutes tell you that Marlex Mesh doesn’t get along with OXYGEN? Wish I would have known this, just keep suffering now, my breathing not normal now, weak, chronic pain, depression, anxiety, and soon death….WHY ARE YOU STILL USING THIS PRODUCT INSIDE HUMANS WHEN PACKAGE STATES ”NOT FOR USE AS PERMANENT IMPLANTS IN HUMANS”
Hi Denise, I am facing L TKA Revision with Marlex Mesh extensor mechanism reconstruction in 2 1/2 wks (Oct 20).
Your email above is now just over a year old;
1. what is your situation now?
2. What are your options?
3. Who did your surgery?
4. Did he/she follow the operative protocol:
5. What have you learned in the year since your surgery? (e.g., Newer procedure, regrets, victories, happy with your surgeon or wish you would’ve gotten another?)
6. Do you belong to a helpful website or FB group for ongoing support and troubleshooting?
I belong to a very supportive and informative group on FB called "Implant Allergies Support Group", I have no doubt you will find community there.
Thank you so much and I hope you are doing well!
Kind Regards,
Jan N